Cody Rhodes vs John Cena Where to Watch for Free
The classic between Palmeiras and Corinthians, played on the day March 16, 2025, was marked by a lot of emotion, rivalry and, of course, controversy.
The big talking point of the match was the Corinthians goal, which guaranteed a decisive moment in the game, but left fans and experts divided.
Many question whether the move should have been canceled. But after all, what would be the reasons for this?
Below, we raise some hypotheses that could justify the disallowance of the goal and that are generating debates among fans, commentators and even refereeing analysts.
One of the first suspicions raised was the possibility of a offside in the play.
At the time of the pass, the Corinthians player was in front of the Palmeiras defense line?
VAR reviewed the play, but was the analysis accurate?
Small details, such as the positioning of the shoulder or foot, can be decisive in disallowing a goal.
If there is a error checking the offside line, the controversy only grows.
Another point of debate is whether there was a lack of construction of the move.
Before the goal, did any Corinthians player push, hold or prevent an opponent from fighting for the ball?
In many cases, a fault committed at the beginning of the play may result in disallowance of a goal, if the VAR notices that it directly influenced the outcome of the play.
The use of the hand is always a decisive factor in disallowing goals.
If at any point before the finalization the ball touched the hand of a Corinthians player, even if involuntarily, the goal could be disallowed.
In quick and confusing plays, VAR may not identify immediately, but replays and subsequent analysis can bring new interpretations.
The rivalry between Palmeiras and Corinthians always generates heated debates, and yesterday's game was no different.
Regardless of the referee's final decision, the doubt about the validity of Corinthians' goal will remain in the minds of fans.
Was there a mistake by the referee? Or was it just another football interpretation?
Now we want to know your opinion: Was the goal legitimate or should it have been disallowed?
